Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, Ground Floor,Room v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Roomno
High Court
16 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, Ground Floor,Room v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Roomno
Date of order
16 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, Ground Floor,Room v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Roomno, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, the present Special Appeal Writ is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 9/2022
1. Balram Meghwal S/o Ishwar Ram Meghwal, Aged About39 Years, R/o M P Road, Behind Manoj Dal Mill, SarvodayBasti Bikaner 33400139 Years, R/o M P Road, Behind Manoj Dal Mill, SarvodayBasti Bikaner 334001
2. Amar Pratap Developers Private Limited, Ground Floor,Room No.2, A-21, Sadul Ganj, Bikaner Through ItsDirector Ashok Kumar Modi.Room No.2, A-21, Sadul Ganj, Bikaner Through ItsDirector Ashok Kumar Modi.
----Appellants
Versus
1. Adjudicating Authority, Prohibition Of Benami PropertyTrans. Act, 1988, (The Benami Prohibition AmendmentAct 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, KhanMarket, New Delhi 110003Trans. Act, 1988, (The Benami Prohibition AmendmentAct 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, KhanMarket, New Delhi 110003
2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), RoomNo.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DassRoad, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005No.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DassRoad, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005
----Respondents
For Appellant(s): Mr. Sanjay NaharFor Respondent(s): Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARGOrder
16/12/2022
Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that inview of the subsequent developments, this Special Appeal Writ hasrendered infructuous.
Hence, the present Special Appeal Writ is dismissed as
having become infructuous.
All the pending applications are disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
22-Rashi/-
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue