Amar Pratap Developmers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room
High Court
11 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Amar Pratap Developmers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room
Date of order
11 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amar Pratap Developmers Private Limited, A-21, Sadulganj, Bikaner v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1451/2022
1. Shrawan Singh Bawari S/o Nanak Singh Bawari, AgedAbout 59 Years, R/o Chak 28 K.y.d., Khajuwala, District-Bikaner, Pin- 334023- Rajasthan.About 59 Years, R/o Chak 28 K.y.d., Khajuwala, District-Bikaner, Pin- 334023- Rajasthan.
2. Amar Pratap Developmers Private Limited, A-21, SadulGanj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shr Ashok Kumar ModiAged 64 Years.Ganj, Bikaner Through Its Director Shr Ashok Kumar ModiAged 64 Years.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. Adjudicating Authority, Prohibition Of Benami PropertyTransactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003.Transactions Act, 1988 (The Benami ProhibitionAmendment Act, 2016), B Wing, 9Th Floor, Lok NayakBhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi 110003.
2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax (Bpu), Room No.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajasthan 302005.103, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road,Jaipur Rajasthan 302005.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushkar Taimini for Mr. Sanjay Nahar.For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
11/07/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioners want to withdraw thiswrit petition.
Consequently, the present writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. All pending applications stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue