Case Law › High Court › Amarjitsingh Walia v. The Assistant Comm...

Amarjitsingh Walia v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur

High Court 03 Aug 2007 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

03 Aug 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Amarjitsingh Walia v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Consequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPURWrit Petition No. 3172/2007 Amarjitsingh Walia s/o Bhupendersingh Walia ..Vs.. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's Orders orCourt's or Judge's Ordersdirections and Registrar's orders. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM: A. P. LAVANDE & R. V. MORE, JJ.DATED : 3rd August, 2007 Heard Mr. Bhattad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Parchure, learned counsel for the respondent. Mr. Bhattad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appeal against the impugned order. The petition is allowed to be withdrawn. Consequently, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Needless to mention here that the petitioner is free to avail of any remedy, if available under the law, against the impugned order. JUDGE JUDGE kahale

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.