Case LawHigh Court › A.m.arun v. The Deputy Director Of Incom...

A.m.arun v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigation),Unit 3(2),Chennai 600 034

High Court 20 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
A.m.arun v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigation),Unit 3(2),Chennai 600 034
Date of order
20 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In A.m.arun v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax (Investigation),Unit 3(2),Chennai 600 034, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, thisCriminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.01.2022 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR CRL.O.P.NO.2821 OF 2018ANDCRL.M.P.NOS.1154 AND 1155 OF 2018 1) M/s.Vasan Health Care Pvt.Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Shri. A.M.Arun, IV Floor, Lancor West Minister, No.70, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004 2) A.M.Arun ...Petitioners / Accused 1 & 2 Versus The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation),Unit 3(2),Chennai 600 034 ...Respondent / Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 ofCriminal Procedure Code, to call for the records relating to theE.O.C.No.179 of 2016 pending on the file of the Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, Economic Offences - II, Egmore, Chennai600 008. This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to call forthe records relating to the E.O.C.No.179 of 2016 pending on thefile of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, EconomicOffences-II, Egmore, Chennai-8. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2.The allegation made in the complaint indicates that thepetitioners suppressed the details of certain accounts in orderto evade the income tax of Rs.22,32,21,512/- and also claimedexcess depreciation. Thereby, the prosecution initiated actionagainst the petitioners for committing the offence of wilfulevasion of Tax. 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners.The learned Special Public Prosecutor (Income Tax) appearingfor the respondent submitted that the 2[nd] petitioner is no moreand this has been recorded in Crl.O.P.No.2822 of 2018 vide orderdated 30.06.2021, wherein it has been held by this Court that,as the 2[nd] petitioner passed away, the charge has been abated andthe Criminal Original Petition was dismissed as abated. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned SpecialPublic Prosecutor (Income Tax) appearing for the respondent, thecharge against the 2[nd] petitioner stands abated since in both thecriminal original petitions, namely Crl.O.P.Nos.2821 & 2822 of2018, the 2[nd]petitioner is one and the same.As far as the 1[st] petitioner is concerned, the allegation in thecomplaint itself indicate that, only when a search is conducted,certain materials could be unearthed by the Income TaxDepartment to prove the finding that there was wilful attemptmade by the petitioners to evade the income tax. 5. Since the allegations made in the complaint is seriousin nature, this Court will not exercise its jurisdiction underSection 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Accordingly, thisCriminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connectedmiscellaneous petitions are closed. Assistant Registrar(CS-II) //True Copy// msv Sub Assistant Registrar To 1. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Economic Offences - II, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. Economic Offences - II, Egmore, Chennai 600 008. 2. -do- through The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. Egmore, Chennai. 3. The Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation), Unit 3(2), Chennai 600 034. 4. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.2821 of 2018and Crl.M.P.Nos.1154 and 1155 of 2018 KJ(CO)RLP(10/02/2022)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan