Ambaji Tukaram Patil v. The Ito & Ors
High Court
07 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ambaji Tukaram Patil v. The Ito & Ors
Date of order
07 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ambaji Tukaram Patil v. The Ito & Ors, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.633 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.633 OF 2003
Ambaji Tukaram Patil .. Appellant
Vs.
The ITO & Ors. .. Respondent
None for the Appellant.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & V.C.DAGA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 7th October, 2008
DATE : 7th October, 2008
DATE : 7th October, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Mr.Vimal Gupta, the learned Counsel for the
Respondent, after taking instructions from the concerned
officer Mr.R.D.Satghare-ITO 11(2)(1), states that the
Appellant has passed away. In view thereof, the present
Appeal stands abated.
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue