In Ambica Mills Limited v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- AMBICA MILLS LIMITED Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NONE APPEARED FOR APPLICANT-ASSESSEE.
Decision: The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 207 of 1985
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO
to see the judgements?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO
of the judgement?
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO
of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution
of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder?
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO
--------------------------------------------------------------
AMBICA MILLS LIMITED
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
--------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance:
NONE APPEARED FOR APPLICANT-ASSESSEE.
MR B.B.NAYAK FOR MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 20/06/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�This reference has been made at the instance of
the assessee. Though the applicant assessee has been
served, neither anybody has appeared on behalf of the
assessee nor ever a paper-book has been filed. In the circumstances, we decline to answer the question and return the reference unanswered. The reference stands disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.