In Amir Educationsociety v. Chiefcommissionerofincome Tax Panchkula, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
W49
IN HlGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANIO HARYANAAT
Cl IANDIGARH
CWPNo [20574]of2008
DateofDecision January29 2010
Amir EducationSociety
1
0
0
I
C9I
Z
I
a5r10
7
Petitioner
Versus
ChiefCommissionerofIncome Tax Panchkula
espondents
CORAMIONBLEMRJUSTICEMeMe KUMAR
HONBLEMle JUSTICEJASWANTSINGH
PresentlMs [RadhikaSuri Advocate]
for the
MrSGarg[Narwana][ Advocate]Ms UrvashiDhuggaAdvocoteMr RajeshSethi Advocatc andMr Vivek Sethi Advocatefor [the][ revenue]Ms UrvashiDhuggaAdvocoteMr RajeshSethi Advocatc andMr Vivek Sethi Advocatefor [the][ revenue]
1
To be referredto theReportersor not22WhethertheshouldbebetheDigest7
shouldbeberepoltedin
Q6
MeMe KUMAR
For
Je
orders[see]CWP No 858 of2009
MeNlKUMARIJUDGEJUDGE
January[29 2010]Pkapoor
JUDGE
P
fA[Q]C6f
Uma2014.03.05 10: 20
Scanned True Copy of OriginalPHHC,Chandigarh
Sahil Soni2016.03.21 12:29I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.