Case LawHigh Court › Amir Educationsociety v. Chiefcommission...

Amir Educationsociety v. Chiefcommissionerofincome Tax Panchkula

High Court 29 Jan 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Amir Educationsociety v. Chiefcommissionerofincome Tax Panchkula
Date of order
29 Jan 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Amir Educationsociety v. Chiefcommissionerofincome Tax Panchkula, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W49 IN HlGH COURT OF PUNJAB ANIO HARYANAAT Cl IANDIGARH CWPNo [20574]of2008 DateofDecision January29 2010 Amir EducationSociety 1 0 0 I C9I Z I a5r10 7 Petitioner Versus ChiefCommissionerofIncome Tax Panchkula espondents CORAMIONBLEMRJUSTICEMeMe KUMAR HONBLEMle JUSTICEJASWANTSINGH PresentlMs [RadhikaSuri Advocate] for the MrSGarg[Narwana][ Advocate]Ms UrvashiDhuggaAdvocoteMr RajeshSethi Advocatc andMr Vivek Sethi Advocatefor [the][ revenue]Ms UrvashiDhuggaAdvocoteMr RajeshSethi Advocatc andMr Vivek Sethi Advocatefor [the][ revenue] 1 To be referredto theReportersor not22WhethertheshouldbebetheDigest7 shouldbeberepoltedin Q6 MeMe KUMAR For Je orders[see]CWP No 858 of2009 MeNlKUMARIJUDGEJUDGE January[29 2010]Pkapoor JUDGE P fA[Q]C6f Uma2014.03.05 10: 20 Scanned True Copy of OriginalPHHC,Chandigarh Sahil Soni2016.03.21 12:29I attest to the accuracy andintegrity of this document
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan