Amit Kotawala Son Of Shri Bhagwan Das Agarwal, Having Hisaddress At v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, Jaipurhaving Its Address At Room
High Court
31 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Amit Kotawala Son Of Shri Bhagwan Das Agarwal, Having Hisaddress At v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, Jaipurhaving Its Address At Room
Date of order
31 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amit Kotawala Son Of Shri Bhagwan Das Agarwal, Having Hisaddress At v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, Jaipurhaving Its Address At Room, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal under Section 148, Section 153C of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 3.The writ petition is accordingly, allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
[2024:RJ-JP:26318-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10547/2021
Amit Kotawala Son Of Shri Bhagwan Das Agarwal, Having HisAddress At Prop. M/s. Authentic Stone Trading Co., 9, Jamna LalBajaj Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur 302001.
----Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, JaipurHaving Its Address At Room No. 416, 4Th Floor, Jeevan Nidhi-Ii,Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle, Jaipur 302005.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Siddharth Ranka
Ms. Apeksha Bapna
: Mr. Siddharth Bapna
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order
31/05/2024
1.Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that issueraised in these petition is squarely covered by order dated19.03.2024 passed by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ PetitionNo.18363/2019- Shyam Sunder Khandelwal Vs. AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax and other connected petitions,wherein notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(in short “the Act of 1961”) and consequential orders have beenquashed giving liberty to the respondents to proceed against thepetitioner in accordance with law.
2.In view of the above submissions, notices issued underSection 148 of the Act of 1961 and the impugned orders arequashed. However, it is made clear that the respondents shall be
at liberty to proceed against the petitioner under Section 153C of
the Act of 1961 in accordance with law.
3.The writ petition is accordingly, allowed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
N. Gandhi/Sunita/175
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.