Amit Padhi v. Heard Counsel Appearing On Behalf Of The Parties
High Court
22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisdb_16012018
Parties
Amit Padhi v. Heard Counsel Appearing On Behalf Of The Parties
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amit Padhi v. Heard Counsel Appearing On Behalf Of The Parties, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABADWRIT TAX No. - 4849 of 2025
Amit Padhi
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J.
1. Heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
2. There appears to be an alternative remedy in this matter, and accordingly, counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner wishes to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Accordingly, in case the petitioner files an appeal against the order impugned within a period of two weeks from date, the Appellate Authority shall grant an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of filing of the said appeal.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
September 23, 2025DKS
(Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue