Amita Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-L
High Court
15 Feb 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Amita Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-L
Date of order
15 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Amita Mittal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-L, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: ITA$!$2015 In view of the averments made in CM-1389-CII-2021, the main appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
105IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
CM-1389-C][-2021 in/andLTA-232-2015Date of Decision: 15.72.202
Amita Mittal
.....Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax-l
......Respondents|
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Present:Mr. Sumit Lalchandani, Advocate forMr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate, for the appellant.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (QRAL)
CM1389CI]202
This is an application for withdrawal of the appeal with libertyto approach the respondent under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme,2020 with a further prayer that in case the offer is not accepted, they may bepermitted to move an application for restoration,
Notice in the application.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel and Ms. UrvashiDhugga, Senior Standing Counsel, accept notice on behalf of Income TaxDepartment and state that they have no objection to the aforesaid,
Application is allowed as prayed for.
The main appeal is taken on board today itself.
_)_
CM12339Cll2015
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay of 132
days in refiling the appeal is condoned.
CM stands disposed of.
ITA$!$2015
In view of the averments made in CM-1389-CII-2021, the main
appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Since, the main case is dismissed as withdrawn, pending!
application, if any, stands disposed of.|
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
152.2021
sharmila
(RAJESH BHARDWAJ)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.