Case LawHigh Court › Amratbhai Thakorbhai Dudhwala v. Assista...

Amratbhai Thakorbhai Dudhwala v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 11 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Amratbhai Thakorbhai Dudhwala v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
11 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Amratbhai Thakorbhai Dudhwala v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 17 of 2009 ==================================================AMRATBHAI THAKORBHAI DUDHWALA VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ================================================== Appearance: MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMARand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI Date : 11/07/2022 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR) Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has filed a note for withdrawal of appearance stating thereunder theappellant – assessee was informed that appellant should makealternate arrangement to engage any other counsel. The said letter having been forwarded by Registered PostAcknowledgment Due has been returned with the postalendorsement ‘Left’ dated 1.7.2022. Since there is nocommunication available on record to establish that counsel forthe appellant has duly intimated the appellant of his intention toretire from the case, memo of retirement cannot be accepted and it stands rejected. Even otherwise, the appellant has beencalled out, none appears. There is no representation on behalf ofthe appellant. This appeal is of the year 2009 pending from past13 years. We do not find any good ground to adjourn thematter. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (ARAVIND KUMAR,CJ) Bharat (ASHUTOSH J. SHASTRI, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan