Case LawHigh Court › Amraw Devi Lodha v. Income Tax Ward-1(3)...

Amraw Devi Lodha v. Income Tax Ward-1(3), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.jaipur

High Court 05 Nov 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Amraw Devi Lodha v. Income Tax Ward-1(3), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.jaipur
Date of order
05 Nov 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Amraw Devi Lodha v. Income Tax Ward-1(3), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.jaipur, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty asprayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7668/2023 Amraw Devi Lodha D/o Shri Chandan Mal Chindalia, Aged About55 Years, Presently R/o 56, Laxman Path, Nemi Nagar, VaishaliNagar, Jaipur-302021 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Income Tax Ward-1(3), Jaipur, Ncr Building, Statue Circle,Jaipur.Jaipur. 2. Union Of India, Through Finance Secretary, Ministry OfFinance (Department Of Revenue), Central Board OfDirect Taxes, North Block, New Delhi.Finance (Department Of Revenue), Central Board OfDirect Taxes, North Block, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Aditya VijayFor Respondent(s): Mr.Siddharth Bapna withMr.Meyhul Mittal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS 05/11/2024 Order Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at length isnot pressing the petition with liberty to pursue the appeal alreadyfiled against the impugned order. The petition is disposed of as not pressed with liberty asprayed for. (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Monika/38
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan