In Amrik Singh v. Cwpad)12004Date Of Decision: 05.11.2014, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Amrik Singh
VERSUS
CWPAD)12004Date of decision: 05.11.2014
..... Petitioner
The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Jalandhar-I, Jalandhar and others
.... Respondents|
CORAMHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJITVE BHALLHON2BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
Present#None for the petitioner.
Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocate, for the respondents
KOK oK
RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL)
Neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present. The
situation was no different on 03.11.2014.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
| RAJIVE BHALLA |JUDGE
05.11.2014Shamsher S.Sabharwal
|} AMIT RAWAL JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue