Amrut C. Munot v. The Income Tax Officer, Ahmednagar
High Court
25 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcaurdb
Parties
Amrut C. Munot v. The Income Tax Officer, Ahmednagar
Date of order
25 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Amrut C. Munot v. The Income Tax Officer, Ahmednagar, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: As such, the appeals stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYAPPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
TAX APPEAL NO.12 OF 2003 WITHTAX APPEAL NO.13 OF 2003 WITHTAX APPEAL NO.56 OF 2007 WITHTAX APPEAL NO.57 OF 2007 WITHTAX APPEAL NO.58 OF 2007
(Amrut C. Munot Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ahmednagar)
Office Notes,Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Shri Alok Sharma, Asstt. Solicitor General for respondent
.....
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA ANDA.I.S. CHEEMA, JJ.DATED : 25th March, 2015.
1.The matters were on board on 23rd March 2015. On the said date, the matters were called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. However, none appeared for the petitioners. In the interest of justice, this Court adjourned the matters to 25th March 2015 for dismissal. Today the matter was called out in the morning session, none appeared for the petitioners. However, the matters were kept back. In the afternoon session also none appears for the petitioners. As such, the appeals stand dismissed. No costs.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
(S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.