Anand Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Patna (Cit
High Court
06 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Anand Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Patna (Cit
Date of order
06 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Anand Gupta v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Patna (Cit, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.2878 of 2011
====================================================
ANAND GUPTA aged about 39 years son of Sri Arjun Gupta resident of Gharaunda East Boring Canal road, P.O. and P.S. Budha colony, Patna - Petitioner
Versus
1.Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1, Patna (CIT)
2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Patna.(ACIT) - Respondents - Respondents
==================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner: Mr. K.N. Jain, Senior Advocate DR. Miss R. Usha, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, Advocate
==================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
And
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 3 06.04.2011 Learned counsel Mr. K.N. Jain appears for the appellant. He admits that against the impugned order an appeal under Section 260 A of the Income Tax shall lie before this Court. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with a view to filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Act. Leave is granted.
Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The petitioner will be at liberty to prefer appeal in the same subject matter.
( R.M. Doshit, CJ.)
Bibhash
(Jyoti Saran, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.