And Another v. Raj Kumar
High Court
05 Jul 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
And Another v. Raj Kumar
Date of order
05 Jul 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In And Another v. Raj Kumar, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 303 OF 2005IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 303 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.3520OF 1991
WRIT PETITION NO.3520
Spaco Carburettors India Ltd.
and Another .. Petitioners
V/s
1.Raj Kumar,
Dy. Commissioner of Income
Tax and Another .. Respondents
Miss. Joshi i/b M/s Mulla & Mulla & CBC for
petitioner
CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND
CORAM: S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.DATE : 5TH JULY,2005.
DATE : 5TH JULY,2005.
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned counsel for the respondents.
2. By this notice of motion the petitioner is
seeking leave to recall an order dated 14.6.2005
whereby the above petition was dismissed in default.
We have perused affidavit in support of notice of
motion and the reasons stated therein. Sufficient
cause is made out for recalling an order dated
14.6.2005. There is no case of inaction,negligence or
want of bonafide. Hence, this notice of motion is
made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
Place writ petition for final hearing on 01.08.2005.
S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.
:2:
J.H.BHATIA,J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.