And Gone v. Teja Constructions, Secunderbad,(Ita
High Court
26 Jun 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
And Gone v. Teja Constructions, Secunderbad,(Ita
Date of order
26 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In And Gone v. Teja Constructions, Secunderbad,(Ita, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Under these circumstances, we are of the view thatthere is no illegality committed by the Tribunal in followingits earlier judgment, which is not challenged.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRAPRADESH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OFJUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESRI KALYAN JYOTI SEN GUPTA
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE G.ROHINI
I.T.T.A. No.96 OF 2013
Between:
Commissioner of Income Tax-VIT Towers, A.C. Guards,Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
..... Appellant
AND
M/s. Amsri Builders,9-1-164, Amsri Plaza,SD Road, Secunderabad.
.....Respondent
The Court made the following :
JUDGMENT:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri K.J. Sengupta)
We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and gone through the impugned judgment and order ofthe learned Tribunal. So far as the matter relates to therevenue appeal is concerned, the learned Tribunal hasdecided the matter following the decision of the Tribunal inthe case of ACIT Vs. Teja Constructions, Secunderbad,(ITA No. 1191/Hyd.2011). There is no statement in thisappeal that the aforesaid judgment of the Tribunal in ACITVs. Teja Constructions, Secunderbad, has been taken toappeal to this court.
Under these circumstances, we are of the view thatthere is no illegality committed by the Tribunal in followingits earlier judgment, which is not challenged.Consequently, the appeal is dismissed. No order as tocosts.
_______________________
Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, CJ.
June 26, 2013MAS
__________
G.Rohini, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.