Case LawHigh Court › Ani Anu Developers P. Limited v. Income...

Ani Anu Developers P. Limited v. Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3), Mumbai

High Court 06 Dec 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Ani Anu Developers P. Limited v. Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3), Mumbai
Date of order
06 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ani Anu Developers P. Limited v. Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2146 OF 2010WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2147 OF 2010WITHWRIT PETITION NO.2148 OF 2010WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2162 OF 2010 Ani Anu Developers P. Limited Versus Income Tax Officer 4(1)(3), Mumbai ..Petitioner. ..Respondent. Ms.A. Vissanji with Mr.S.J. Mehta for the petitioner.Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondent. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & R.M. Savant, JJ. DATE : 6[th] December, 2010. P.C. : 1.In all these petitions, the petitioners have challenged the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessments for the respective assessment years under Section 147 of the Act. Admittedly, the objections raised by the petitioners against the reopening of the assessment have not yet been disposed off by the assessing officer. 2.In this view of the matter, the assessing officer is directed to dispose off the objections raised by the petitioners, as expeditiously as possible. 3.If the objections are rejected, then till the objections are communicated to the petitioners and for a further period of four weeks, the reassessment proceedings shall stand stayed. 4.The writ petitions are disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs. (R.M. Savant, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan