Case Law › High Court › Aniket Ajit Phatarpekar And Anr v. Assis...

Aniket Ajit Phatarpekar And Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Circle-2(1) , Panaji And 2 Ors

High Court 15 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcbgoa

Parties

Date of order

15 Dec 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Aniket Ajit Phatarpekar And Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax-Circle-2(1) , Panaji And 2 Ors, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEETIN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAAPPELLATE SIDE MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 758 OF 2016 ANIKET AJIT PHATARPEKAR AND ANR., VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-CIRCLE-2(1) , PANAJI AND 2 ORS., ... Petitioner ... Respondent Adv. Ms. S. Bandodkar for the applicants, REGISTRAR'S ORDER Application dated 29/06/2016 for bringing on record the Legalrepresentative of deceased of Petitioner no.2 is hereby granted. Applicant Counsel to make necessary changes in the Cause title. Date: 15th December, 2016 Board ( P. M. Shinde )Deputy Registrar

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.