Case LawHigh Court › Anil Kumar Garg Huf v. Income Tax Office...

Anil Kumar Garg Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5 (1) Jaipur

High Court 21 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Anil Kumar Garg Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5 (1) Jaipur
Date of order
21 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Anil Kumar Garg Huf v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 5 (1) Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 3/2022 Anil Kumar Garg Huf, 60, Rajamal Ka Talab, Amer Road, JaipurThrough Its Karta Anil Kumar Garg, S/o Of Gokul Prasad GuptaAged About 55 Years R/o 60, Rajamal Ka Talab, Amer Road,Jaipur. ----Appellant Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward 5 (1) Jaipur Having Its Address At NewCentral Revenue Building Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur- 302005 ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Prateek KedawatFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA 21/02/2024 Order Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matterfor some time, on instructions submits that an effort would bemade to get the Income Tax Return of Smt.Kanika Kothawala orwould get an affidavit with regard to her status as Income TaxAssessee, her source of income and liberty is sought to approachthe Tribunal by way of misc. rectification application, in case thedocuments are received. The petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty asprayed for. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan