Anil Kumar Sahu v. Akansha Sahu
High Court
16 Jul 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Anil Kumar Sahu v. Akansha Sahu
Date of order
16 Jul 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Anil Kumar Sahu v. Akansha Sahu, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the above submission made by counsel for the appellant,the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous .the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous .
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
2025:CGHC:33559-DBNAFR
Digitallysignedby AMITPATEL
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
FA(MAT) No. 81 of 2024
Anil Kumar Sahu S/o Premlal Sahu Aged About 35 Years R/o Near Income TaxOffice, Naharpara Janjgir, Dist. Janjgir Champa, C.G.
... Appellant
versus
Akansha Sahu W/o Anil Sahu Aged About 30 Years R/o Through D/o Sanat KumarSao, Shanti Nagar, Near Ameri Road Garden, Ward No. 17, Bilaspur, Thana AndDist. Bilaspur, C.G.
... Respondent
For Appellant: Mr. Vikas Kumar Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey, J.Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J.Order on Board
Per,Rajani Dubey, Judge17.07.2025
1.Learned counsel for the appellant submits that on 24.06.2025, divorceby mutual consent has been taken place between the parties as perSection 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned FamilyCourt, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) and the copy of thedivorce by mutual consent is filed by the appellant, as such theinstant appeal has now become infructuous.by mutual consent has been taken place between the parties as perSection 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the learned FamilyCourt, Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) and the copy of thedivorce by mutual consent is filed by the appellant, as such theinstant appeal has now become infructuous.
2.In view of the above submission made by counsel for the appellant,the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous .the instant appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous .
Sd/-Sd/-(Rajani Dubey)(Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Judge
AMIT PATEL
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.