Anil Malik v. State, Through Pp
High Court
13 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Anil Malik v. State, Through Pp
Date of order
13 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Anil Malik v. State, Through Pp, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4871/2021
Anil Malik S/o Sh. Dharam Pal Singh Malik, Aged About 56 Years,H.no. 51, Kawa Khera, Near Income Tax Office, Bhilwara,Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State, Through Pp
2. Sh. Rahul Garg S/o Sh. Jagdish Garg, Aged About 26Years, Near Baba Dham Mandir, Pratap Nagar, Bhilwara,Rajasthan.Years, Near Baba Dham Mandir, Pratap Nagar, Bhilwara,Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Aishwarya Anand
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. AR Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
13/09/2022
Order
At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor submits that charge-sheet has been filed.
The factual report furnished by learned Public Prosecutor is
taken on record.
In view of the above, the present misc. petition is disposedof with liberty to the petitioner to take up all his issues before thelearned trial court at appropriate stage. All pending applicationsalso stand disposed of.
(DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI), J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue