In Anilaben Viramsinh Sarvaiya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(4), Vadodara, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2071 of 2020
==========================================================
ANILABEN VIRAMSINH SARVAIYA
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(2)(4), VADODARA
==========================================================Appearance:MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALAand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA
Date : 28/01/2020
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
This writ-application is not pressed with a liberty to prefer statutory appeal in accordance with law.
The writ-application is disposed of, as not pressed without expressing any opinion on merits.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
GIRISH
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.