Case LawHigh Court › Anilbhai C. Patel v. Commissioner Of Inc...

Anilbhai C. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 23 Oct 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Anilbhai C. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
23 Oct 2001
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Anilbhai C. Patel v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ANILBHAI C.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 90 of 1988 with INCOME TAX REFERENCE Nos 91 and 92 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- ANILBHAI C. PATEL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 90,91 and 92 of 1988 MR JP SHAH for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA COMMON ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �Mr JP Shah with Mr Manish J Shah learned counsel for the applicant-assesses state under instructions that the assesses do not wish to press these references. �Accordingly, we decline to answer the questions referred to us in these references. �The References accordingly stand disposed of with no order as to costs. �����(M.S. Shah,J) �����(D.A. Mehta,J) zgs/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan