Case LawHigh Court › Ankur Agarwal v. Income-Tax Department

Ankur Agarwal v. Income-Tax Department

High Court 12 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Ankur Agarwal v. Income-Tax Department
Date of order
12 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ankur Agarwal v. Income-Tax Department, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of the prayer made, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 1114 of 2022 Ankur Agarwal --- --- Petitioner Versus 1.Income-Tax Department through its National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi 2.Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income – Tax/ Income Tax Officer, National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi 3.Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax, Dhanbad 4.Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1), Dhanbad --- --- Respondents ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGHHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate 03/12.04.2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application on instructions since it has been rendered infructuous as the Assessing Officer has accepted the returned income and closed the proceedings. In view of the prayer made, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) (Deepak Roshan, J.) A.Mohanty
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan