In Anoop Gopikishan Jaju v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 909.CA-3113-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3113 OF 2024 IN ITAST/849/2024
ANOOP GOPIKISHAN JAJUVERSUSTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Malpani Mohit Rajendra
Advocate for Respondent/State : Mr. Bharaswadkar patil kalpalata
...
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 3 JULY 2024
PER COURT :
.This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 23 daysin preferring the Income Tax Appeal.
2.Issue notice to the respondent. Mrs. KBP Bharaswadkar waivesservice.
3.Considering the nature of the dispute coupled with groundsmentioned in the application and the fact that the delay is of 23 days,the application is allowed. The delay is condoned. Office to registerthe Income Tax Appeal.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.]
[ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue