Anoop v. Mohta, Jj
High Court
17 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Anoop v. Mohta, Jj
Date of order
17 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Anoop v. Mohta, Jj, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
:1:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
FIRST APPEAL NO. 93 OF 1989
WITH
FIRST APPEAL NO. 94 OF 1989
--------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
--------------------------------------------------------
Shri K.K. Tated, A.G.P. for the
appellants.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO&
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATE : 17.08.2004
P.C.
. Heard learned Government
Pleader.
2. The appellants in both
the appeals challenge the orders
dated 30th March 1987 passed in
Acquisition Appeal No.38 /(Bom.)
1987 and order dated 29/9/1998
passed in Acquisition Appeal No.
39/Bombay/1987 by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal in a matter of
:2:
acquisition of flat No.D-206, New
Purnima Apartments, Co-Op.
Housing Society Ltd, Bombay-
4000261, under Sub-section (6) of
Section 269-F of Income Tax Act,
1961.
3. During the pendancy of
these appeals the Legislation has
deleted the provision of Section
269-F from the stature book. In
that view of the matter nothing
survives in this appeal. Appeal
accordingly disposed off. No
order as to costs.
. Parties concerned to act
on a simple copy of this order,
duly authenticated by the Court
Stenographer/Sheristedar of this
Court.
[ F.I. REBELLO,J.]
:3:
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.