Another v. Santosn Kumar Shetty In Ita
High Court
30 Aug 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Another v. Santosn Kumar Shetty In Ita
Date of order
30 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Another v. Santosn Kumar Shetty In Ita, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, IA No.1/2016 filed for condonation of the delay in filing the| appeal and the appeal are dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
-
ITA No.569/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 3Q DAY QF AUGUST J2ZQ1/PRESENT|
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH
AND
THE HON‘'BLE MRS, JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.569/ 201
BETWEEN :
1.|PR.COMMISSIONER OF.
INCOME TAX-4, BMIC COMPLEX
KORMANGALA, BANGALORE
2DTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF|INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1), BMTCINCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1), BMTC
COMPLEX, KORMANGALA
BANGALORE
..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND =
SRI H.NOOR AHMED.M/S NOOR ENTERPRISES|GANIGARAPE[A.T.PET, HOSAKOTE
BANGALORE - 562 114 .. RESPONDENT|
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION260-A OF I.I.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE- THESUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND [TO SET ASIDE THEORDER DATED 12.04.2016 PASSED BY THE ITAT, A’ BENCH),BANGALORE PASSED IN ITA NO.883/BANG/2014 FOR’ THEASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009.
-
ITA No.569/2016
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS,THIS DAY,H,G,. RAMESH , DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)$
Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants fairly|
Submits that tne question raised in this appeal is |
answered against the appellants by a Division Bencn
of tnis Court tn Commissioner of Income Tax and
another v. Santosn Kumar Shetty in ITA No.590/2013 |
{DD 15.07.2014] and other connected appeals. Hence,
IA No.1/2016 filed for condonation of the delay in filing the|
appeal and the appeal are dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
KSR
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.