Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
11 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
11 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Ansal Properties And Infrastructure Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~28
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5891/2024, CM APPL. 24318/2024 & CM APPL. 47175/2024 47175/2024
ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. N.P. Sahni and Mr. Kumail Abbas Advocates. Abbas Advocates.
versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Sunil Aggarwal, SSC, Mr.
Srivansh Pandya, JSC, Ms. Priya, JSC, Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSC and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate. JSC, Mr. Viplav Acharya, JSC and Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R11.02.2025
%
1.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition.
2.Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to the said prayer. the said prayer.
3.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
FEBRUARY 11, 2025/mk
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.