Anuj Agarwal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12 Kolkata &Ors
High Court
25 Feb 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Anuj Agarwal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12 Kolkata &Ors
Date of order
25 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Anuj Agarwal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 12 Kolkata &Ors, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
03.03.2025Supplementary
Item No.1
PG/KS
Ct. No.1
M.A.T. 411 of 2022
Anuj Agarwal Vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 12 Kolkata &Ors.
Mr. Abhratosh Majumder, Ld. Sr. Adv.
Mr. Avra Majumder
Mr. A. Agarwal
Mr. F. Ghaffar,Mr. A. ChaturbedyMs. S. Srivastava
…..For the Appellant
Mr. Aryak DuttMs. Riya Kundu
…..For the Income Tax Authority
1.The matter has been listed under the caption ‘To Be Mentioned’.
2.It is submitted by the learned advocate for the appellant that thename of Mr. Avra Majumder, learned advocate for the appellanthas not been mentioned inadvertently in the order datedFebruary 25, 2025.name of Mr. Avra Majumder, learned advocate for the appellanthas not been mentioned inadvertently in the order datedFebruary 25, 2025.
3.This defect be rectified and the name of Mr. Avra Majumder,learned advocate for the appellant be mentioned in the orderdated February 25, 2025.learned advocate for the appellant be mentioned in the orderdated February 25, 2025.
4.This order shall form part of the order dated February 25, 2025.
(T.S.SIVAGNANAM)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue