A§Pli¢Ant v. Surendra Kumar[Kataria
High Court
25 Oct 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
A§Pli¢Ant v. Surendra Kumar[Kataria
Date of order
25 Oct 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In A§Pli¢Ant v. Surendra Kumar[Kataria, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Anu
r
HIGH COURT OF[CHHATTISGARH,]BILASPUR
D.B.:HON’BLE MR. [ KUMAR][ SINHA][ &]HON’BLE MR. RANGNATH JJ.
M.C.C. No. 614/2013
Income Tax Officer,[Jagdalpur]
A§PLI¢ANT
Versus
Surendra Kumar[Kataria]
RESPQNDENT
(APPLICATION [ RESTORATION][ OF][ l.T.A.][ NO.][ 17/2006)]
Appearance:Mr. Anand Dadariya,[Advocate][ for][ the][ applicant.]
ORDER
(25th[of][ October,][ 201][ 3)]
Per Sunil Kumar[Sinha,][ J.]
1.Heard.
2.Mr. Anand Dadariya.[Iearned][ counsel][ for][ the][ applicant,][ makes][ statemen]tthatinadvertentiyinsteadof filingareviewpetition,theappiicant hasfiiedM.C.C. making prayer[for][ restoration][ of][ the][ originai][ Income][ Tax][ Appeal][ (ITA),]therefore,thisM.C.C.may bepermittedtobe withdrawnastheapplicantwould me a duly[constituted][ review]petition.
3.M.C.C.No.614/2013forrestoration,therefore,isdisposedofaswithdrawn.
XSd/-Rangnath[‘Chandrakar]JudgeWiW Wi
ll
Sd/_Sunil[Kumar][ Sinha]Judge
**
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.