Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V
High Court
22 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V
Date of order
22 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In the result, the appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2 OF 2006
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2 OF 2006
Laffans Petrochemicals Ltd. ..Appellant.
V/s.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent.
Mr Atul Jasani, Advocate for the Appellant.
Mr Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
AND V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATED: 22ND OCTOBER, 2008.
DATED: 22ND OCTOBER, 2008.
P.C.:
P.C.:----
----
1. Heard the learned counsel, Mr Atul Jasani, for
the appellant and the learned counsel, Mr Vimal Gupta,
for the respondent.
2. Mr Vimal Gupta, the learned counsel undertakes
to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent within
a period of three weeks from today.
3. Mr Vimal Gupta, learned counsel for the
Respondent brought to our notice the judgment of the
Apollo Tyres Ltd V.
Supreme Court in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd V.
Apollo Tyres Ltd V.
Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273. After
Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273.
Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273.
hearing the parties and after perusal of the judgment,
we find that the question of law raised in the above
appeal has been covered in favour of the Revenue and
against the Assessee. In the light of the said
judgment, no substantial question of law arises for
our consideration.
4. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.
(V.C. DAGA,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
(V.C. DAGA,J)
(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.