Case LawHigh Court › Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The...

Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V

High Court 22 Oct 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V
Date of order
22 Oct 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Apollo Tyres Ltd v. Supreme Court In The Case Of Apollo Tyres Ltd V, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In the result, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2 OF 2006 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 2 OF 2006 Laffans Petrochemicals Ltd. ..Appellant. V/s. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent. Mr Atul Jasani, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr Vimal Gupta, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN CORAM: Dr.S. RADHAKRISHNAN AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. AND V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATED: 22ND OCTOBER, 2008. DATED: 22ND OCTOBER, 2008. P.C.: P.C.:---- ---- 1. Heard the learned counsel, Mr Atul Jasani, for the appellant and the learned counsel, Mr Vimal Gupta, for the respondent. 2. Mr Vimal Gupta, the learned counsel undertakes to file Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent within a period of three weeks from today. 3. Mr Vimal Gupta, learned counsel for the Respondent brought to our notice the judgment of the Apollo Tyres Ltd V. Supreme Court in the case of Apollo Tyres Ltd V. Apollo Tyres Ltd V. Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273. After Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273. Commissioner of Income-tax 2002 ITR 273. hearing the parties and after perusal of the judgment, we find that the question of law raised in the above appeal has been covered in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee. In the light of the said judgment, no substantial question of law arises for our consideration. 4. In the result, the appeal is dismissed. (V.C. DAGA,J) (V.C. DAGA,J)(DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J) (V.C. DAGA,J) (DR S. RADHAKRISHNAN,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan