Case LawHigh Court › Apot/355/2023 Ia No: Ga/1/2023 Churiwal...

Apot/355/2023 Ia No: Ga/1/2023 Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 24 May 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Apot/355/2023 Ia No: Ga/1/2023 Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
24 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Apot/355/2023 Ia No: Ga/1/2023 Churiwal Commercial Company Private Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-16 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE APOT/355/2023 IA NO: GA/1/2023 CHURIWAL COMMERCIAL COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(1), KOLKATA & ORS. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 24[th] May, 2024 Appearance : Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, Adv. Ms. Suman Saheni, Adv. …for Appellant Mr. Aryak Dutt, Adv. …for respondents The Court : This intra-court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated 5[th] September, 2023 in WPO 1532 of 2023. The appellant had challenged the re-assessment order dated 30[th] May, 2023 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The learned Single Bench dismissed the writ petition primarily on two grounds, firstly, the appellant had not been diligent in prosecuting the alternative remedies and secondly, as against the re-assessment order a statutory appeal is maintainable. After we have elaborately heard Mr. Rajarshi Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the appellant/assessee and Mr. Aryak Dutt, learned Counsel for the respondents, we find complicated questions of facts are required to be gone into. It is not as if the appellant/assessee did not have an opportunity since the appellant/assessee had responded to the show cause notice by sending reply dated 22[nd] May, 2023. This reply has been considered and a conclusion has been drawn. The correctness of the conclusion drawn in the re-assessment order can be adjudicated only by the Appellate authority as disputed questions of fact are to be gone into. Therefore, we are of the view that the appellant should exercise statutory appellate remedy under the Act. For the above reasons, the appeal is dismissed with liberty to the appellant to file an appeal before the statutory Appellate authority within 60(sixty) days from the date of receipt of the server copy of this order. If such appeal is filed, the Appellate authority shall not reject the appeal on the ground of limitation. The application IA No: GA/1/2023 is also dismissed. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan