Case Law › High Court › Appaicant (Appetlant v. Jagdish Prasad B...

Appaicant (Appetlant v. Jagdish Prasad Bansal

High Court 04 May 2010 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

04 May 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appaicant (Appetlant v. Jagdish Prasad Bansal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

^^ Priya MCC ^^//o HSGH COURT OF CHHARttlSGARH AT BILASPUR Coram:-Hon'ble Shri Dhirendra Mishra &Hon'ble Shri R.N. Chandrakar. JJ M.C.C (PR) No.1065/2010 Commissioner of income Tax,Bilaspur Appaicant(Appetlant) VersusJagdish Prasad Bansal Respondent ApDlicationforrestorationofTaxCaseNo.(PR)No.3343/09 vide order dated 04.12.2009Present:Shri Rajeev Shrivasatava, counset for theapplicant. Oral Order(Passed on 4th of May, 2010) Per Dhirendra IVIishra. J:- Learned counse! for the applicant submits that hedoes not want to press this appiication. (2)Accordingly, this M.C.C. is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/-R.N. ChandrakarJudge Sd/-Dhirendra MishraJudge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.