Appeejay Education Society, Jalandhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions), Circle And Others
High Court
16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appeejay Education Society, Jalandhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions), Circle And Others
Date of order
16 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Appeejay Education Society, Jalandhar v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax(Exemptions), Circle And Others, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection, Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
D4
Civil Writ Petition No.6021 of 2019Date of Decision:September 16, 2019
Appeejay Education Society, Jalandhar
_.. Petitioner
Versus
The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), Circle and others.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
)))
Present:Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate, Mr. Kushagra Mahajan, AdvocateMs. Sumiti Lalchandani, Advocate and Ms. Soumya Singh, Advocatefor the petitioner.
Mr. Kunal Sharma, Sr. Standing Counselfor the respondents.
)))
AJAY TEWARIiJ- (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the interregnum, theAssessing Officer has passed a fresh assessment order, which is appealable and hemay be permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty to take all pleas in theappeal.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection,
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as
prayed for.
(AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) >JUDGE
September 16, 2019sonia arora
Whether speaking/reasoned ;Yes/NoWhether Reportable :Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue