Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector -2, Panchkula
High Court
06 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector -2, Panchkula
Date of order
06 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector -2, Panchkula, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA No. 304 of 2017Date of decision: 06.09.2018|
M/s GMH Organic, through Shri. Ishu Goyal, S/o Sh. Amar NathGoyal, aged about 34 years, partner H.No. 118, Mansa Devi Complex,Sector-5 Panchkula.
.--.--Appell
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Aayakar Bhawan, Sector -2, Panchkula.
..-.Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL |HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. B.M. Monga, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocatefor the appellant. ©
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent.
For orders, see ITA No. 332 of 2015(M/s Admac Formulations,
H.No. 272, Sector-17, Panchkula, through its Authorized Representative
Shri. AJay Batra Vs.Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula)
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
(Avneesh Jhingan)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue