Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
High Court
06 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
Date of order
06 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appell v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.GURBAX SINGH
GURBAX SINGH2018.10.08 11:07
ITA No. 443 of 2015Date of decision: 06.09.2018|
M/s Virgo Industries, through its Partner Bhishambar Das Arora,H.No. 129, Sector 10, Panchkula
.--.--Appell
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula.
..-.Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL |HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate and Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocatefor the appellant. ©for the appellant. ©
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Senior Standing Counsel for respondent.
For orders, see ITA No. 332 of 2015(M/s Admac Formulations,
H.No. 272, Sector-17, Panchkula, through its Authorized Representative
Shri. AJay Batra Vs.Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula)
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
September 06, 2018
(Avneesh Jhingan)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue