Appell v. Commissioneroftincometax,Aayakarbhawan,Sector-17,Chandigarh
High Court
06 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appell v. Commissioneroftincometax,Aayakarbhawan,Sector-17,Chandigarh
Date of order
06 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appell v. Commissioneroftincometax,Aayakarbhawan,Sector-17,Chandigarh, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH.GURBAX SINGH2018.10.08 11:07
ITA No. 135 of 2018Date of decision: 06.09.2018|
M/s Micro Turners, through Shri Anil Sehgal, S/o Sh. B.K. Sehgal, agedabout 60 years, Partner M/s Micro Turners, SCO 80-81, Fourth Floor,Sector17-C, Chandigarh.
.--.--Appell
Vs.
CommissioneroftIncomeTax,AayakarBhawan,Sector-17,Chandigarh.
..-.Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL |HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present: Mr. B.M. Monga, Advocate and Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocatefor the appellant.
For orders, see ITA No. 332 of 2015.(M/s Admac Formulations,
H.No. 272, Sector-17, Panchkula, through its Authorized RepresentativeShri. AJay Batra Vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Panchkula)
September 06, 2018
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)
Judge
(Avneesh Jhingan)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue