Case Law › High Court › Appella v. The Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Appella v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh

High Court 21 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

21 Nov 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appella v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

ITA No. 508 of 2008Date of decision: 21.11.2018. M/s. Glaxo SmithKline Consumer Healthcare Limited .--.- Appella Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chandigarh .-....Responden CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’BLE MRS. JUSTICEK MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with | Mr. Rohit Jain, Advocate & Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advocatefor the Appellant. Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent. | Ajay Kumar Mittal.J. For orders, see ITA No. 403 of 2016(M/s. Glaxo SmithKline Consumer Healthcare Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Circle-4(1), Chandigarh) November 21, 2018| (Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge (Manjari Nehru Kaul) | Judge

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.