Appellan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Chandigarn
High Court
24 Feb 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appellan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Chandigarn
Date of order
24 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellan v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Chandigarn, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT ATHANDIGARH
ITR-153-1999 (O&M)Date of Decision: February 24, 2020
M/s Chandigarh Golf Club, Chandigarh
..Appellan
Versus
Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarn
..Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
Present:Mr. Mukul Gupta, Advocatefor the appellant.
Mr. Denesn Goyal, Advocatefor the respondent.
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
+&Today, Mr. Mukul Gupta, Advocate puts in appearance onbenalf of M/s Chandigarn Golf Club, Chandigarh and informs that theassessee intends to approach the respondent under Vivad SeVishwas Scheme.
2Accordingly, the Reference is returned unanswered withliberty to the appellant to revive the same in case need so arises.
(AJAY TEWARI)JUDGE.
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
JUDGE
JUDGE
24027070Atul'Whether speaking/ reasonedYes/No'Whether reportableYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue