Case LawHigh Court › Appellan v. M/S Avery Cycle Industries L...

Appellan v. M/S Avery Cycle Industries Ltd

High Court 28 Mar 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Appellan v. M/S Avery Cycle Industries Ltd
Date of order
28 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellan v. M/S Avery Cycle Industries Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. ITA-272-2016(0&M) Date of decision: 28.03.2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Ludhiana © ... Appellan Versus M/s Avery Cycle Industries Ltd. ... Responden CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI,CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGECHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI, JUDGE Present: |Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the appellant.RERE KRISHNA MURARI, C.J.(Oral) Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that since thetax effect involved is less than Rs.50 lacs, he has instructions to withdrawthe present appeal in view of Circular No. 03/2018, dated 11.07.2018 issuedby the Central Board of Direct Taxes, New Delhi. However, he has prayedthat liberty be granted to the revenue to file an application for revival of theappeal in case something survives therein. |Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. It is,however, clarified that withdrawal of the appeal by the revenue shall not betaken to be affirmation of order of the Tribunal on merits. Further, the legalissue aS claimed by the revenue is being left open to be adjudicated in anappropriate case. ( Krishna Murari) | Chief Justice ( Arun Pall ) Judge 28.03.2019RajanRajan Whether speaking / reasoned:YESWhether Reportable: NO
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan