Case Law › High Court › Appellan v. M/S Grand Prix Fab Pvt. Ltd

Appellan v. M/S Grand Prix Fab Pvt. Ltd

High Court 16 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

16 Sep 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Appellan v. M/S Grand Prix Fab Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH IAL ITA-26-2018(0&M)Date of Decision:September 16, 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad ...... Appellan Versus M/s Grand Prix Fab Pvt. Ltd......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL Present:Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Sr. Standing Counsel for the appellant. Mr. Divya Suri, Advocate for|Mr. Sachin Bhardwaj, Advocate for the respondent. AJAY TEWARI|iJ- (Oral) Learned counsel for the Appellant-Revenue states that since the taxeffect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed in Circular No.3 of 2018dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, further amended videCircular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 read with Letter No.F.No.279/Misc./M-93/2018-ITJ dated 20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present Appeal.However, he prayed that liberty be granted to the Revenue to file an application forrevival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, (AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE (HARNARESH SINGH GILL) ©JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.