In Appellan v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANAAT CHANDIGARHLTA-02-2007
Date of Decision:24.08.2022
Oswal Woolen Mills Ltd.
....... Appellan
Versus
The Commissioner of Income Tax
...... Responden
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRKEJINDER SINGH DHINDSHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA!
Present: Mr. Amit Parsad, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing Counsel andMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing Counsel forrespondent.
)))))
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA J.(Oral)
Learned counsel representing the appellant makes a
statement at the bar that he has instructions not to pursue the instant
appeal.
Disposed of as not pressed.
(TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA)
JUDGE
24.08 2022shweta
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
: Yes/No
Whether reportable
:- Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue