Case Law › High Court › Appellant-Assessee v. The Commissioner O...

Appellant-Assessee v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) – Iii, Central Revenue Building, Jaipur

High Court 06 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Appellant-Assessee v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) – Iii, Central Revenue Building, Jaipur
Date of order
06 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Appellant-Assessee v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) – Iii, Central Revenue Building, Jaipur, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Restoration Application No. 728 / 2017 M/S Swastik Udyog, F-72, 73, Industrial Area, Newai, Distt. Tonk. ----Appellant-Assessee Versus The Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals) – III, Central Revenue Building, Jaipur. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Taylor For Respondent(s) : _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS Order 06/02/2018 Heard on application u/s 5 of the Limitation Act. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The delay of two days in filing the restorationapplication is condoned. Heard on restoration application also. For the reasons mentioned in the restorationapplication, the same is allowed. Matter be restored to its original number. Defect/s will be removed within one week. No further time will be granted. Main matter to come up for admission on 20.02.2018. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS)J. (K.S.JHAVERI)J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan