Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent M/S. Syndicate Engg. Co. Bhilai
High Court
12 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent M/S. Syndicate Engg. Co. Bhilai
Date of order
12 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent M/S. Syndicate Engg. Co. Bhilai, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
N
w;i^' 'i"-..:^. -,^p. •/
'•^^^^^-^~\/\/^'^^.i ^v~<.r\^'\,\J-^^
I THEm<^©CCT]^J3iRi DICATm^^A^^^
•:/C!]BEHXTT: RH: .: • '•'••;-.:::;'. :•' ;; ;':1'
•M.G.CfaiaQ.Si-^/08
...u^
APPELLANT
CommissioherofIncOnietax,1;Raipur..': /: /:'. :'.':.;
1;':
: /: /:
A'^0
R.R.y"^^.-••••/n*^
»...—••—""^.^—?
RESPONDfiNT
M/s. SyiidicafeEngg. Co,''Bhilai. 61; \HS>^tf-ff,<-&BV*^^WAfrtfi+tt' ii3>*& SHlt-*a: 'BK.TWVh.:vV^••".'
:APPIJC^IO]S8E0Ifasg»RA'I%^(CotninissMmei-I^I^^Btatsg^^ME/s.SyndM^frEngm^;Taii'&^)3iGeiiMiinM @UB^:%'iaAi^^fiiii'otsEtgiiani^•HoNB^E'.'iEe^ifeKieMiPBHAIJLA.ANDHOiN'fiEET.T'.SHARMA
•:-<
•
Ashok
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURM.C.C. No. 132 of2008
APPELLANTCommissioner oflncome Tax, Raipur.VERSUSRESPONDENTM/s. Syndicate Engg. Co. Bhilai.
RESPONDENT
APPLICATIQNFORRESTQRATLONOFI.TA N0,14/03
Coram :Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agmhotri &Hon'ble Slm T.P.Shanna, JJ.Hon'ble Slm T.P.Shanna, JJ.
Present:Shri Anand Dadariya, Advocate for fhe appellant.
ORDER
(Passed[on][ 12th][ day][ ofSeptember,][ 2012)]
1.Leamed counsel appearmg for the appellant submits that the counsel forthe appellant could not appear on account of bona flde mistake,tfierefore, I.T.A. No. 54/2003, which was dismissed on 16.01.2008, forwant ofprosecution, may be restored to its file.
2.
Reasonable and sufficient cause has been shown. I.T.A. No. 54/2003 isrestored to the original file.
3.
A copy ofthis order be placed on record oforiginal I.T.A andthe samebe listed for hearing.
sd/-T.P. SharmaJudge
Sd/-Satish K. AgnihotriJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue