Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent Premchand Agrawal
High Court
12 Sep 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent Premchand Agrawal
Date of order
12 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant Commissioner Oflncome Tax, Raipur v. Respondent Premchand Agrawal, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WTHEm®©€)l}I^O]?JUDICATUREATBlLASPUIt'l':^:.-CHHATTIS(^RH':;'l-.::^...;.^^^^'DivisionBenGtl1;;1.'/'"
:.M.C.G.SNO.^^:; 1/68 :
'
.::
•
•'':.''::'::;:'/
AP^ELLANT (
:- ^ommissioflersfIncoHietax,
^
R.R.W
'
'
• ••'i ••'i • •.
^^^^~~—~.....ff-tisy^'i^'G'^'"'• ••'i ••'i •'/''--':;/:;• •''. ..'
''--
'/:;:1
.
.....ff-tisy^'i^'G'^'"':a»lL..""">:"^"?-<:~t~'~'~'.:.: ,,...
...;..
; ^.
.:':
R.ESPONDENT
PremchandAgra.wal,-A-cBhat^ara. ^"^0^ ^f^• y^^; ••ftt^>M^^iK^^F^l^^:j^i-^(&^"a-r:
%»y
Ap]PLieATION^OR^]E^C)RATlON( I.T.A.NO.^(Comniissio^i'oftInccHnetax^^rem^TO TTS OBiySEP^ MWBl^BY I CAXJ^DATED 16.1.tt8 ¥^!SEB^TfiEDl\^SIONS]^HONBLE AeTIN©GH]@EFWSTIGESHRL^G^BHAIJA.AND HO^'BSEI; T.P.SHARMA
li'
Ashok
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
M.C.C. No. 133 of2008
APPELLANTCommissioner oflncome Tax, Raipur.VERSUSRESPONDENTPremchand Agrawal.
APPLICATION FOR RESTORATION OF I.T.A. N0. 61/03
Coram :Hon'ble Shri Satish K. Agnihotri &Hon'ble Sta-i T.P.Sharma, JJ.
Present:Shri Anand Dadariya, Advocate for the appellaut.
ORDER
(Passed on 12th dayofSeptember, 2012)
Leamed counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the counsel forthe appellant could not appear on account of bona fide mistake,therefore, I.T.A. No. 61/2003, which was dismissed on 16.01.2008, forwant ofproseeutiou, may be restored to its file.Reasonable and sufficientcausehas been shovwi. I.T.A. No. 61/2003 isrestored to tfae original file.
1.
2.
A eopy ofthis order be placed on record of original LT.A. and the samebe listed for hearing.
3.
Sd/-T.P. SharmaJudge
Sd/-Satish K. AgnihotriJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue