Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028
High Court
17 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028
Date of order
17 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CMP Nos.9702 and 9699 of 2025in TCA SR Nos.45584 and 35484 of 2025
Principal Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle 3(1) Chennai
Appellant in both appeals
Vs
KNR Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1st Street, R.A.Puram, Chennai 028 PAN AFLPM 1623F
Respondent in both appeals
For Appellant(s):
For Respondent(s):
M/s.R. Karthik
M/s.G.Baskar
ORDER
The Hon'ble Chief Justiceand Sunder Mohan, J.
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Shri Baskar, who takes notice on behalf of respondent, leaves it to the court, though he submits that the reasons are not properly explained.
2. Shri Karthik states the delay was in re-presenting the appeals and not in filing the appeals and, therefore, requests relying on his own affidavit to condone the delay.
3. We condone the delay. Applications are disposed of.
Appeals be listed for admission on 24.6.2025.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)
17.06.2025
sra
CMP Nos.9702 and 9699 of 2025 inTCA SR Nos.45584 and 35484o of 2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.