Case LawHigh Court › Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivan...

Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028

High Court 17 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028
Date of order
17 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Appellant In Both Appeals v. Knr Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1St Street, R.a.puram, Chennai 028, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN CMP Nos.9702 and 9699 of 2025in TCA SR Nos.45584 and 35484 of 2025 Principal Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle 3(1) Chennai Appellant in both appeals Vs KNR Manivannan1, Krishnapuri 1st Street, R.A.Puram, Chennai 028 PAN AFLPM 1623F Respondent in both appeals For Appellant(s): For Respondent(s): M/s.R. Karthik M/s.G.Baskar ORDER The Hon'ble Chief Justiceand Sunder Mohan, J. (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Shri Baskar, who takes notice on behalf of respondent, leaves it to the court, though he submits that the reasons are not properly explained. 2. Shri Karthik states the delay was in re-presenting the appeals and not in filing the appeals and, therefore, requests relying on his own affidavit to condone the delay. 3. We condone the delay. Applications are disposed of. Appeals be listed for admission on 24.6.2025. (K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.) 17.06.2025 sra CMP Nos.9702 and 9699 of 2025 inTCA SR Nos.45584 and 35484o of 2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan