Appellant In Both Appeals v. Ruby Realty Private Limitedno.b-908, Radiance Shine Apartments, Kazhipattur, Omr, Chennai 600 103
High Court
17 Jun 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Appellant In Both Appeals v. Ruby Realty Private Limitedno.b-908, Radiance Shine Apartments, Kazhipattur, Omr, Chennai 600 103
Date of order
17 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Appellant In Both Appeals v. Ruby Realty Private Limitedno.b-908, Radiance Shine Apartments, Kazhipattur, Omr, Chennai 600 103, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.06.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.K.R.SHRIRAM, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
CMP Nos.9692 and9694 of 2025in TCA SR Nos.35665 and 35493 of 2025
Commissioner Of Income TaxCentral Circle 3-(4) Chennai
Appellant in both appeals
Vs
Ruby Realty Private LimitedNo.B-908, Radiance Shine Apartments, Kazhipattur, OMR, Chennai 600 103
Respondent in both appeals
For Appellant in both appeals :M/s.R.Karthik
* * * * *
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
As directed by the Court on 10.06.2025, Sri.Sanjay Kumar, Principal
Commissioner of Income-tax, has filed further affidavits dated 13.06.2025.
The Hon'ble Chief Justiceand Sunder Mohan, J.
2. Respondent is absent though served and Sri.Ranganathan states, copy of the further affidavits also have been served on respondent and says that affidavit of service has been filed.
3. Accepting the statement of Sri.Ranganathan and in view of the explanation given in the further affidavits dated 13.06.2025, the delay is condoned. Applications are disposed of.
Appeals be listed for admission on 24.06.2025.
(K.R.SHRIRAM, CJ) (SUNDER MOHAN, J.)
17.06.2025
sra
CMP Nos.9692 and 9694 of 2025 inTCA SR Nos.35665 and 35493 of 2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.