Appellant Mahesh Reddy v. Respondents 1. Sangem Ekka

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURDIVISION BENCHDIVISION BENCH CORAM:HON'BLE SHRI RAJEEV GUPTA, CJ. &HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J.HON'BLE SHRI DHIRENDRA MISHRA, J.IVIiscellaneous Appeal (Cl No.870 of 2008 APPELLANTMahesh Reddy S/o Late M.C. ReddyCSaimantNo.4Aged about 32 years, R/oln front ofWay of Income Tax (Commissioner)Office,BhartiyaNagar,Bilaspur,Tahsil & District - Bjlaspur (C.G.)CSaimantNo.4Aged about 32 years, R/oln front ofWay of Income Tax (Commissioner)Office,BhartiyaNagar,Bilaspur,Tahsil & District - Bjlaspur (C.G.) Versus RESPONDENTS1.Sangem Ekka S/o Late Simon EkkaNon-apDlicantsAged about 52 years R/o In front ofWay of Income Tax (Commjssioner)Office,BhartiyaNagar,Bilaspur,Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (C.G.)Non-apDlicantsAged about 52 years R/o In front ofWay of Income Tax (Commjssioner)Office,BhartiyaNagar,Bilaspur,Tahsil & District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Owner 2.BranchManager,TheNewIndiaInsurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office,TransportNagar,Korba,D.0.(450 900) Tahsil and Djstriot Korba(C.G.)....InsurerInsurance Co. Ltd., Divisional Office,TransportNagar,Korba,D.0.(450 900) Tahsil and Djstriot Korba(C.G.)....Insurer 3.Smt. Kanti Reddy W/o M. ShrinathReddy Aged about 40 Yrs.Reddy Aged about 40 Yrs. 4.Hari Reddy S/o W/o Late M. ShrinathReddy Aged about 10 Yrs. Through :legalrepresentativeofMotherappellant No.1Reddy Aged about 10 Yrs. Through :legalrepresentativeofMotherappellant No.1 5.Smt.M.Parvati W/o M.C.Reddy,Aged about 60 yearsAged about 60 years Respondent No.3 to 5 of the residentof in front of Way of Income Tax(Commissioner)Offtee,BhartiyaNagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District -Bilaspur (C.G.)Claimants No.1 to 3of in front of Way of Income Tax(Commissioner)Offtee,BhartiyaNagar, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District -Bilaspur (C.G.)Claimants No.1 to 3 Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act. subbu Present:Shri Bharat Rajput, learned counsel for the appettant.ORDER(7th July, 2008)ThefollowingorderoftheCourtwasbypassedRajeev Gupta, C.J.: Shri Bharat Rajput, learned counsel for the appellant seekspermission to withdraw the appea! filed by the appellant againstthe award dated 17.07.2007, passed by the Ninth AdditionalMotor Accident Claims Tribunal (FTC), Bilaspur, in Claim CaseNo.29/2006. 2.Permission granted. 3.The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-Dhirendra MishraJudge Sd/-Chief Justice