Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Appellant v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 11, Range 3, Mumbai & Anr. Respondents
Date of order
15 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Appellant v. Asstt.commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 11, Range 3, Mumbai & Anr. Respondents, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORIGINAL SIDE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.328 OF 2003
M/s.Lead Consultants Pvt.Ltd.
Appellant
vs.
1.Asstt.Commissioner of Income tax,Central Circle 11, Range 3, Mumbai &anr.Respondents
Mr.Pramod Kumar Parida for the appellant.
CORAM: R. M. LODHA &J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 15th October 2004
P.C.
The
learned counsel for the appellant submits that
the appellant is not desirous of prosecuting the appeal.
2. The appeal is allowed to be withdrawn.
3. Refund of court fee as per the law.
(R.M. LODHA,J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue